WSCUHSD Preview

The West Sonoma County Union High School District (WSCUHSD) will host a special meeting at 6 p.m. Monday, Nov. 23 to reconsider putting a parcel tax measure on the ballot in March and discuss the transient occupancy tax measure put forth by the county, according to the Nov. 23 agenda.

The agenda lists Superintendent Toni Beal’s request that the board approve the parcel tax measure, pivoting from the board’s 3-2 vote to defeat the proposal at the Nov. 18 meeting, with board president Jeanne Fernandes and trustees Diane Landry and Ted Walker in opposition.

Board vice president Kellie Noe and trustee Angie Lewis voted to support its placement on a 2021 ballot after Beal said the board must decide that night, regardless of whether the board had discussed the West County Transient Occupancy Tax measure approved Nov. 17 by the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors.

5th District Supervisor Lynda Hopkins will then deliver a presentation on the transient occupancy tax (TOT) for the board’s consideration, with Beal’s request for an approval of a resolution in support of the tax, the agenda said.

According to the agenda, Beal recommends the trustees accept the resolution to support the county’s proposed ordinance. The resolution specifies that the board of supervisors would reintroduce the ordinance with “minor changes to ensure attainable requirements for school funding eligibility and membership on the Education Advisory Committee that represents all affected west county parties.”

Further, the document said the ordinance “will dedicate 50% of the revenue generated to schools and education opportunities in the West County Transient Occupancy Tax Area as long as recipient schools are actively working towards regional unification efforts and striving to maintain existing school facilities and programs.”

Next, the board may take action on potential school consolidation, as Beal asks the trustees for direction on next steps. The conversation on whether to consolidate to prevent the $2 million shortfall projected in the 2022-23 school year was on the Nov. 18 agenda, but the board postponed the item for the Monday special meeting after discussion about the parcel tax measure consumed much of the meeting.

The Nov. 23 agenda said district staff will provide “a summary of stakeholder feedback, a review of current district program limitations and budget challenges and possible scenarios for addressing these program and budget challenges.”

A district survey on potential consolidation and a separate poll conducted by Isom Advisors assessing support for a parcel tax measure yielded some feedback from the west county community on the possibility of unifying the student body onto one campus to save resources and keep some programming, as discussed at the Nov. 18 meeting.

The stakes raise higher as the Sonoma County Office of Education (SCOE) requires the board demonstrate how it will cut down or drum up $2 million by the 2022-23 school year in its first interim report, due to be presented to the board on Dec. 9 and to SCOE on Dec. 15, or risk certifying as qualified, or potentially unable to meet its financial obligations in the current year or next two years, Beal said at the district’s Nov. 4 town hall. Meanwhile, the district’s structural deficit and declining enrollment drains the budget and forces the district to consider more program cuts.

Consolidation is one path the board contemplating to avoid the financial peril of sinking to a negative certification after classifying as qualified, which would result in the district losing the ability to borrow money and emptying out of funds in June 2022, Beal said at the Nov. 4 town hall. This scenario gets worse after that, Beal said — if the district could not complete payroll, it would need to pursue a state loan and the state would assign a state administrator to call the shots, stripping the district of decision-making power.

Edit: A previous version of this article stated that the first interim report needed to be to SCOE on Dec. 9. The report is due to be presented to the school board on Dec. 9 and to SCOE on Dec. 15.

(1) comment

MKH

To fund our public education on TOT is to make it dependent on vacation rentals - one of the contributing forces to high rents, high property values and our housing shortage. Supervisor Hopkins wants to turn the 31 rooms of the Sebastopol Inn into homeless housing at great tax payer expense. This means we lose the TOT, property tax and sales tax from the Sebastopol Inn. Wouldn't a more solid plan be to keep hotels as hotels and limited AirBnBs? If we put a moratorium or lottery system on AirBnbs, then we can preserve our housing stock for long term rentals and not encourage people to purchase homes in the area as vacation rental investments. We need to look at our housing policy in relationship to our school funding. As average home prices in Sebastopol approach $1 million, we need to make sure we're preserving housing stock for teachers, staff and families. Do not make public education dependent on AirBNB rental. We should build more hotels and keep the ones we have.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.